The Real World
Do young people need to get used to doing things they don't want to do, because that's how the world works?
Illustration by Eliza Fricker: Twitter: @_MissingTheMark
When I talk about giving young people more autonomy in their education, I’m often told that that’s just not how the world works. Adults have to do things they don’t want to do all day, I’m told, so children have to learn to do the same. That’s just real life. Here’s why I disagree.
Most adults have a reason for doing what they do. Whether that reason is putting food on the table, whether it’s because they value the work they do and find it meaningful, or whether it’s because they really enjoy their work, there is a reason.
There is something in it for them. They aren’t working simply because they have been told that this is what they have to do and they’d better just suck it up. There is also usually (not always) some element of choice in what they do. They can choose things which suit them in some ways, even if not in everything.
Within a job, studies show that people perform better in their jobs when they have more autonomy, purpose and when they feel connected to other people. I’ve worked in jobs with very little autonomy. I worked in a cake factory where we could not talk to each other, our breaks were decided on by the supervisor and if we didn’t work fast enough they would speed up the conveyor belt and we’d have to put strawberries on tarts at double speed. It was awful. My saving graces were the pay and that after a while I got a job at Boots the Chemist instead and so I could leave. Boots was a paradise in comparison. There still wasn’t much autonomy, but it had redeeming features like friendly colleagues and windows through which I could see the outside world. And they still paid me.
For some children at school, there aren’t many of those redeeming features. They don’t get paid, they don’t get a chance to decide whether what they are doing is valuable to them, and it doesn’t really matter if they enjoy it. They can’t leave. Their peers may or may not be friendly. And they can’t get a job at Boots. They are there because others have told them they must be there and that there are no other options. For some of them, that’s okay because they enjoy it, they feel valued and it has meaning for them. For others, it isn’t okay. There is no reason in it for them. The only reason is ‘because you have to’.
Even if we do accept that most of adulthood is spent doing things you have to do, it doesn’t follow that we should make childhood the same. Childhood is an opportunity which doesn’t come back. It’s a space which could be filled with exploration, learning and fun – precisely because children are not yet adults, and they shouldn’t have to worry about putting food on the table. It’s a time when most children don’t have to provide for themselves. It is a time to grow. They don’t have the same responsibilities, and that is what makes childhood special. The purpose of work is to get the work done, the purpose of education is for young people to learn and develop. Those things are different, and education doesn’t have to be run like work. When the aim is learning, it’s just not the same as when the aim is to make a lot of cakes.
When people tell me that children need to spend their school years being made to do things, so they can get into practice for adulthood, I wonder what their fear is. What catastrophe would happen if we raised our children to ask questions, not to put up with ‘because I said so’, to look at the system and ask, does it have to be this way? Could it be that they might grow up to demand change? Could it be that they make others uncomfortable with their honesty?
When I’m told that the ‘real world’ requires us to make children do things, as that’s what their lives will be like, then I ask why. Is that really the best humans can come up with? In response I get fury. I get ridiculed, mocked, and told that I just don’t live in the real world.
Then I wonder whether perhaps in fact I am the feared catastrophe, the one who just won’t shut up and do as she’s told.
What an epiphany.
As the 4th school has just put me into the aggressive parent category after fairly minimal communication, I have been wondering how come that schools nearly instantly hate me, when I am quite certain that this is not the kind of reaction I provoke in the rest of my life, including my complex and not always uncontroversial working life.
This time all I had to fo this time after being summoned due to ‘concerns’ , was to request information about the nature of the concern, who else would be attending the meeting (would not have been the first time that what was portrayed as a ‘chat’ had me face half the school staff), and also ensure that the school’s records in relation to the concerns would be available with specific information of what happened, when, involving whom.
But back to the point: Your blog has made me think that the authoritarian, unquestioning culture of ‘because I decide or say so’ and ‘suck it up’ does not only play out for the children, but is fundamentally entrenched in those working within that system and applied by extension to the parents also. The same submissive stance and gratefulness for attention is expected from parents.
I have separately wondered about the incredible arrogance of ‘school’ in terms of ‘we know best’, ‘what we don’t see does not exist’ and similar beliefs. But those are all manifestations of the same unquestioning, defensive culture of fear of challenge.
So, I think I too am a feared catastrophe, in a small way. I bet my life and work habit of educating myself, questioning and challenging oozes out of my every pore even when I try hard to signal that I come in peace.
Wish me luck for my meeting tomorrow, not for my sake, but that of my child. Because cuffley you are a feared catastrophe, your child suffers.
Thank you for confirming once again why we home educate our kids.