Recently I talked to a young person who told me about starting secondary school. We were lined up, she said, and our uniform was inspected. I had never been in trouble at primary school but they said my shoes were wrong. There was a coloured stitch around the heel.
She got a warning that first day, and told that the next day the same shoes would mean a short detention. There was no time or money to buy new shoes before the next day so back she went with the same shoes and duly got a 30 min detention. She tried to explain but was told there were no excuses.
Next day it was the same. Still no time or money to buy new shoes so she wore her black trainers and hoped they wouldn't notice. They did. Also not allowed. She got angry when given another detention - it’s unfair! - and she told the teacher so loudly and tearfully.
This was disrespectful behaviour and so her sanction was increased. More behaviour points and she’s heading for Reset. She still can’t get new shoes.
What exactly are those sanctions meant to be correcting? Where is the ‘misbehaviour’ which will be changed by ‘consequences’? Was it buying those shoes in the first place - not really her mistake, since she’s 11? Or was it not having money to buy new ones? Or having parents who work hours which means they can’t shop during the week? Or not quietly accepting the sanctions?
What is she meant to be learning from the experience?
I can tell you what she did learn because she told me. She learnt that she hates getting detentions and that she doesn't think the teachers like her. She learnt that school cares more about the threading on her shoes than about her education and learning. She started telling her parents she won't go. That’s seen as more ‘behaviour’ and her parents are told to put sanctions in place at home. Pretty soon she's very unhappy - but that still doesn't change the threads on her shoes.
That’s the problem when we make sweeping statements about ‘behaviour’ which fail to ask questions about what is going on. What we see as ‘misbehaviour’ is dependent on the context. If by 'behaviour' we really mean 'compliance' then we should call it that. Learning to comply isn't the same as learning to behave.
That's because behaviour is about much more than compliance. Behaviour is the result of an interaction between the person and their environment. If we ignore the role of the environment, we can make things worse
.
I just don't get any of this: it's pretty much Kafkaesque. Where in life is it going to be beneficial to teach a child that punishment might befall them if something beyond their control happens to them? Uniform bits are always going to be bought by parents, the kids don't have much say, definitely not at 11. It seems to me we're training them to accept abusive conditions when they grow up.
It feels like a lot of things going on in schools in the UK nowadays should be considered abuse but we're mostly all collective just letting it be (with some valuable exceptions such as Naomi) and then wonder why mental health is so fraught among youngsters (25% of MH referrals are under 18 I think?).
We also encountered the shoes issue - must be all black, must not look like trainers, must be worn at all times. Despite agreeing some slight accommodations and emailing pictures of possibles to the SENCo, my eldest also felt that the minutiae of his shoes should not make the huge impact on his learning that it did. Really, when it comes down to it, does it matter that much that everyone looks exactly the same? I know there are arguments about the haves and have-nots but as a family in the latter category being asked to shell out nearly £600 a year for two minimal sets of school uniform just so my son can be uncomfortable, not able to focus or learn and need extra bits of under clothing to cope with the required uniform seems rather excessive. Especially when the detentions come for minor infringements like not having a ruler because someone had stolen it from him, or wearing a coat inside! Needless to say, we now home school and the boys are both much happier. Nothing against the school - it was the best of the options available but all schools seem to have this huge emphasis on compliance in little things, then no action is taken for the big things. When youngsters leave school we hear regular comments from the workplace that they have no initiative, can’t plan, need spoonfeeding, etc. I wonder why?!